Latest news with #collective bargaining
CTV News
2 days ago
- Business
- CTV News
Tentative deal with province's AMAPCEO union workers approved
A new 3-year tentative deal has been reached with Association of Management, Administrative and Professional Crown Employees of Ontario (AMAPCEO). 'I am very pleased that we have reached a tentative agreement with AMAPCEO. Particularly in times of economic uncertainty, good-faith collective bargaining is a necessary and important process that benefits all parties,' said MPP York-Simcoe Minister Caroline Mulroney, president of the Treasury Board. Mulroney said the tentative agreement is part of Ontario's plan to build a competitive economy with stability across the public sector. 'We look forward to sharing details of the agreement once it has been fully ratified by both parties,' she said.
Reuters
6 days ago
- Politics
- Reuters
US judge tosses Trump administration bid to cancel union contracts
July 24 (Reuters) - A federal judge has dismissed a bid by President Donald Trump's administration to obtain judicial permission to cancel dozens of collective bargaining agreements between eight federal agencies and unions representing their employees. Waco, Texas-based U.S. District Judge Alan Albright decided late on Wednesday that the agencies do not have legal standing to bring a lawsuit to implement a Trump executive order exempting them from having to bargain with unions, as the American Federation of Government Employees, or AFGE, union had argued. Albright's ruling deals at least a temporary setback to the Republican president's broader efforts to lift restrictions on firing federal employees and shrink the federal bureaucracy. The White House, the U.S. Department of Justice and AFGE did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday. The departments of Defense, Justice, Homeland Security, Veterans Affairs, Agriculture and Housing and Urban Development, as well as the Environmental Protection Agency and the Social Security Administration, filed the lawsuit in March. The American Federation of Government Employees represents 800,000 federal workers. The agencies had claimed in the lawsuit that the administration of Trump's Democratic predecessor Joe Biden entered into collective bargaining agreements with AFGE in the months before Trump took office to block him from firing federal workers en masse and pursuing other priorities. Eliminating collective bargaining would make it easier for agencies to alter working conditions and fire or discipline workers. It also could prevent federal worker unions from challenging Trump administration initiatives in court. Albright, who Trump appointed during his first term as president, did not decide whether the president's order allows the agencies to nullify existing union contracts. Trump in the executive order excluded agencies from collective bargaining obligations that he said "have as a primary function intelligence, counterintelligence, investigative or national security work." The order applies to the Justice, State, Defense, Treasury, Veterans Affairs, and Health and Human Services departments, among other agencies. Trump's order affects about 75% of the roughly 1 million federal workers represented by unions, according to court filings. It significantly expanded an existing exception from collective bargaining for workers with duties affecting national security, such as certain employees of the CIA and FBI. The administration's lawsuit was filed on the same day that Trump issued the executive order, meanwhile unions filed separate lawsuits seeking to block the order saying it violates the U.S. Constitution and federal workers' rights to unionize and collectively bargain. Federal judges in California and Washington, D.C., have blocked agencies from implementing Trump's order in lawsuits by the AFGE and another union. A U.S. appeals court in May paused the Washington judge's ruling, and a different court is considering doing the same in the California case. The unions have said the vast majority of workers affected by the order are not in roles related to national security or intelligence. And also in May, a federal judge in Kentucky ruled that the U.S. Department of Treasury lacked standing to seek to void a union contract covering tens of thousands of Internal Revenue Service employees. AFGE has said that the Texas lawsuit was an act of retaliation against the union for filing a series of legal challenges to other Trump administration policies, including mass firings and layoffs and restrictions on civil service protections for federal employees. It also said that none of the agencies covered by Trump's order are primarily involved in intelligence or national security work. Some of the contracts allow employees to continue working remotely, delegate decision-making "to unaccountable private arbitrators," and limit the power of the president and agency heads to identify and address poor performance, the agencies said in the lawsuit.
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
New collective-bargaining bill looms as historic day arrives
Within college athletics over the last several months, few topics have garnered more interest than collective bargaining — from football and basketball coaches as well as top athletic administrators. On Capitol Hill, at least two lawmakers are interested too. Two Democrats, Rep. Summer Lee and Sen. Chris Murphy, are reintroducing on Wednesday a bill to affirm and expand college athletes' rights to organize, form unions and collectively bargain with their universities and/or conferences, according to the legislation obtained by Yahoo Sports. The bill's introduction comes on what could be a historic day for the college sports industry: Two House committees are expected to consider a separate bill, the SCORE Act, and potentially advance that legislation to the House floor. In the NCAA's more than five-year lobbying effort for congressional legislation, no all-encompassing college sports bill, such as the SCORE Act, has advanced out of a committee in either chamber. A full House of Representatives vote could come as soon as this fall — a potentially groundbreaking moment but one that should come with a caveat. The NCAA-friendly SCORE Act, while bipartisan, faces stiff pushback in a divided U.S. Senate, where at least seven Democrats are needed to overcome the filibuster and reach the 60-vote margin for any bill passage. Murphy and Lee's bill, perhaps a longshot to pass in this Congress, serves as a reminder of what could transpire in the future as the college sports industry barrels toward a more professionalized model with the approval of the House settlement's athlete revenue-share concept. The bill would amend the National Labor Relationship Board Act to cover both private and public universities and require the board to recognize conferences and schools as 'multi-employer bargaining units.' The bill establishes 'equitable terms and conditions' for college athletes to choose representation in order to negotiate collective-bargaining agreements. 'College athletes exhibit the markers of employment as established under the common law definition of the term 'employee,'' the bill says. 'The NCAA and its member institutions have denied college athletes a fair wage for their labor by colluding to cap compensation; they maintain strict and exacting control over the terms and conditions of college athletes' labor; and they exercise the ability to terminate an athlete's eligibility to compete if the athlete violates these terms and conditions.' The bill is contradictory to the mostly Republican-backed SCORE Act, which provides the NCAA, power conferences and new enforcement arm, the College Sports Commission, with many of its requests from Congress: (1) limited antitrust protection to enforce rules; (2) the preemption of various state NIL laws; (3) codification of the House settlement terms; and, perhaps most notably, (4) a clause deeming athletes as students and not employees. The bill is facing pushback not only from Democrats but from a variety of avenues, including players associations of the NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL and MLS; the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committees; and one of the leading Democrats in the Senate, Maria Cantwell. 'If you thought the dissolution of the Pac-12 was a heist, the SCORE Act is the National Championship of all heists,' said Cantwell, representing the state of Washington. 'This legislation is a power grab by the two biggest conferences that will leave athletes, coaches, and small and mid-sized institutions behind.' All three entities — the players associations, Olympic committee and Cantwell — each provide a criticism to the SCORE Act: It prevents a path for collective bargaining and employment of athletes; and codifies a House settlement that, many believe, will negatively impact women and Olympic sports and grows the already looming financial gaps between major conference programs and those other lower-resourced schools in Division I. In a recent letter to House lawmakers, four state attorney generals — from Florida, Tennessee, Ohio and New York — urged Congress to reject the SCORE Act, describing it as 'a misguided effort that will enshrine in federal law the arbitrary and biased authority of the NCAA at its worst.' But the bill has plenty of supporters who point to the many benefits, such as the legislation's oversight of agents and its requirement to provide athlete degree completion and post-graduate healthcare. Meanwhile, Murphy and Lee's bill gestures toward a completely different system, one that turns athletes into employees who can collectively bargain — a concept that many in college athletics believe should be explored deeply as a way to bring stability and regulation. 'Collective bargaining and employment status shouldn't be seen as negative terms,' Tennessee athletic director Danny White told Yahoo Sports last month. 'I think there's a lot of people who think the same way I do. We can go through another three or five or 10 years of a difficult environment. Or we can accept the reality and fix it right now.'
Daily Mail
7 days ago
- Sport
- Daily Mail
Colin Cowherd erupts at WNBA star Kelsey Plum for Caitlin Clark jab following All-Star Game stunt
Fox Sports' Colin Cowherd blasted Los Angeles Sparks star Kelsey Plum for a joke she made at Caitlin Clark 's expense that missed the mark. WNBA players are set to be locked in a fight with the league's owners over salary increases and other items as the collective bargaining agreement between the players' union and owners is set to expire at the end of the season. At this weekend's event, players wore shirts that said 'Pay Us What You Owe Us' - a pointed statement at the owners as they hope to cash in on the rising popularity of the league. Those shirts were agreed upon at a players meeting on Saturday morning. However, according to Plum, no one from 'Team Clark' (Caitlin's roster for the All-Star Game) attended. Plum joked, 'Not to tattletale but, zero members of Team Clark were very present for that.' Sabrina Ionescu, who was part of 'Team Clark', rolled her eyes and replied, 'That really needed to be mentioned.' Plum replied that she was 'trying to make the situation light'. "You went from a Motel 6 in a sketchy part of town to a Four Seasons in the shopping district. Stop talking." @colincowherd reacts to Kelsey Plum calling out Caitlin Clark at WNBA All-Star Weekend — Herd w/Colin Cowherd (@TheHerd) July 21, 2025 Kelsey Plum took a jab at Caitlin Clark over the WNBA All-Stars' calling out league owners Judging by that last comment, it's unclear if Plum meant that no one from Clark's team was physically at the meeting - or if they may have been tired or possibly recovering from a night before. Regardless, Clark and her team wore the shirts throughout the weekend in support of the players' united front to make a better living. But Plum's comments generated outrage across the internet at the time, and it was discussed again on Monday when Cowherd chipped in. After Cowherd remarked that the WNBA players are 'going to get a raise, there's no question', he then took aim at Plum's comments. 'Why do you take a shot at the golden goose, Caitlin Clark?' he asked. 'You guys were flying - before she arrived - on one of those airlines that made you pay for a cup of water. One of those airlines that... the planes are the color of a highlighter. Now you're flying private. 'You went from a Motel 6 in a sketchy part of town to a Four Seasons in the shopping district. Stop talking.' To be clear, Clark wasn't responsible for the WNBA upgrading its travel conditions for players - something the union and players had been demanding for years prior to her arrival in the league (owners who previously provided charter flights for players were even fined by the league before 2024).
Fox News
22-07-2025
- Sport
- Fox News
Sophie Cunningham instructs reporters to tell WNBA commissioner to 'pay us' amid union contract standoff
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles! Indiana Fever star Sophie Cunningham sent a blunt message to the WNBA and commissioner Cathy Engelbert while speaking to reporters on Sunday. When asked about whether the WNBA season is too long or too short, Cunningham referenced the league's ongoing negotiations with the players' union about a new collective bargaining agreement, and players expressing a desire for more money. "You can just tell Cathy to pay us, and then we can have a discussion," Cunningham said. CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON Cunningham is just one of many players to speak out about desiring more compensation as the Women's National Basketball Players Association (WNBPA) negotiates a new deal with the league. Players at the All-Star game on Saturday wore T-shirts that read "Pay Us What You Owe Us" during warmups. The shirts included the WNBPA logo. ANGEL REESE OPENS UP ABOUT CYBERBULLYING FROM FANS AFTER 2023 NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME The players met with league officials Thursday, and the sides did not reach a deal. Chicago Sky star Angel Reese was one of many WNBA players who have criticized the league's handling of negotiations. "It was an eye-opener for me. Like, hearing the things and hearing the language of things and not things that I was happy to hear. It was disrespectful the things that we were sent back, the proposal that we were sent back," she said Friday. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP "It's important to be able to be vocal. If I sit back, it looks like I don't care." New York Liberty star Sabrina Ionescu said the players weren't going to settle for "the minimum" in negotiations, while Phoenix Mercury player Satou Sabally called the league's latest offer a "slap in the face."
